NYK 126–139 CHI · Jan 4, 2025

Final

2025-01-04

Best games of 2024-25 →

NYK

126

139

CHI

NBA Game / League Pass Shot Chart

Standard box score.

Key Performers

Points

Rebounds

Assists

Steals

Blocks

Field goals made

3-pointers made

Free throw attempts

Plus/minus

Turnovers

True shooting %

Against their usual

Points against each player's usual scoring rate for the minutes he has played (this season blended with last season by how much of it there is, season data through Jan 3; the same "usual" as the box score's Vs usual). 8+ minutes and 6+ points off.

NYK

Karl-Anthony Towns 44 pts · usual 26.2 · +17.8

Jalen Brunson 33 pts · usual 24.3 · +8.7

Josh Hart 2 pts · usual 14.7 · -12.7

CHI

Coby White 33 pts · usual 18.1 · +14.9

Zach LaVine 33 pts · usual 22.9 · +10.1

Patrick Williams 5 pts · usual 13.0 · -8.0

Team Comparison

NYK

Away

PTS

126

AST

eFG%

53.6%

REB

TOV

Usual 2024-25 (35 g) with 2023-24 · eFG 56.8% · 3P 38.1% · FT 79.6% · 3PA/FGA 0.41 · FTA/FGA 0.24

Shooting

2P% 59.7%

3P% 26.7%

FT Attempts 28

FT% 78.6%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 20

Pts in Paint 72

2nd Chance Pts 21

Steals 7

Blocks 3

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 49

Offensive 18

Defensive 31

Team rebounds 5

OREB% 34.6%

DREB% 77.5%

Four Factors

Points each part added (+) or cost (−) compared with a league-average possession (about 1.1 points); a turnover costs that whole possession. Net is their sum: roughly how many points the offense scored above an average one on the same trips, not who won.

Net Points (vs avg) +6.9

2PT Factor +11.7

3PT Factor -3.5

Turnover Factor -14.9

OREB Factor +4.1

FT Factor +9.6

CHI

Home

PTS

139

AST

eFG%

64.9%

REB

TOV

Usual 2024-25 (34 g) with 2023-24 · eFG 55.1% · 3P 36.8% · FT 79.3% · 3PA/FGA 0.45 · FTA/FGA 0.21

Shooting

2P% 54.4%

3P% 54.1%

FT Attempts 18

FT% 94.4%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 18

Pts in Paint 56

2nd Chance Pts 16

Steals 6

Blocks 4

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 43

Offensive 9

Defensive 34

Team rebounds 2

OREB% 22.5%

DREB% 65.4%

Four Factors

Net Points (vs avg) +19.2

2PT Factor +4.8

3PT Factor +22.9

Turnover Factor -14.9

OREB Factor -2.4

FT Factor +8.8

NYK VS CHI

Offensive Efficiency

126

Points

139

59.7%

2P%

54.4%

53.6%

eFG%

64.9%

26.7%

3P%

54.1%

FTA

78.6%

FT%

94.4%

Pace & Advantage

Assists

Fast Break Pts

Pts in Paint

2nd Chance Pts

Possessions & Rebounds

Total Rebounds

Defensive Rebounds

Offensive Rebounds

Team Rebounds

77.5%

Defensive Reb %

65.4%

34.6%

Offensive Reb %

22.5%

Turnovers

Steals

Blocks

Four Factor Accounting

+6.9

Net Points (vs avg)

+19.2

+11.7

2PT Shooting

+4.8

-3.5

3PT Shooting

+22.9

-14.9

Turnovers

-14.9

+4.1

Off. Rebounding

-2.4

+9.6

Free Throws

+8.8

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

FG% is calculated for each zone from Play-by-Play Data.

Player Sequence Search

Events

Direct Connections All

Waiting for selection...

How they scored

Loading scoring breakdown...

Points off turnovers

Each turnover the other team scored on: off a steal (a live ball), or off a turnover without a steal (out of bounds, a violation, an offensive foul).

Loading event sequences...

Team Analytics

Lineup Analysis

Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions. Best lineup uses Net Rating and requires at least 5 minutes and 10 possessions.

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Uninterrupted lineup intervals with period/clock boundaries and scoring margin.

Interval	Lineup	Min	For	Against	+/-

Player Stat Visualizer

Game Momentum & Flow

Chance to win after each play, from the score, clock, home court and possession. It has no team strength, so early on both teams count as even.

Biggest Lead: CHI (Home)

Biggest Lead: NYK (Away)

Scoring Runs (8-0 or better)

No significant runs detected yet.

Play-by-Play

Loading plays…

Player Game Rotation (Plus/Minus)

Swipe sideways to see the full game

WOWY Combos

Pick up to four players: every on/off combination of them, from this game's five-man lineups. Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions (as on the lineup cards); under 3 minutes is a small sample.