MIA 97–92 UTA · Jan 9, 2025

Final

2025-01-09

Best games of 2024-25 →

MIA

UTA

NBA Game / League Pass Shot Chart

Standard box score.

Key Performers

Points

Rebounds

Assists

Steals

Blocks

Field goals made

3-pointers made

Free throw attempts

Plus/minus

Turnovers

True shooting %

Against their usual

Points against each player's usual scoring rate for the minutes he has played (this season blended with last season by how much of it there is, season data through Jan 8; the same "usual" as the box score's Vs usual). 8+ minutes and 6+ points off.

MIA

Duncan Robinson 0 pts · usual 8.6 · -8.6

Terry Rozier 9 pts · usual 15.5 · -6.5

UTA

Everyone close to usual so far.

Team Comparison

MIA

Away

PTS

AST

eFG%

47.3%

REB

TOV

Usual 2024-25 (35 g) with 2023-24 · eFG 53.8% · 3P 37.0% · FT 79.0% · 3PA/FGA 0.43 · FTA/FGA 0.27

Shooting

2P% 53.7%

3P% 28.0%

FT Attempts 15

FT% 73.3%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 17

Pts in Paint 34

2nd Chance Pts 16

Steals 10

Blocks 7

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 49

Offensive 13

Defensive 36

Team rebounds 9

OREB% 25.5%

DREB% 76.6%

Four Factors

Points each part added (+) or cost (−) compared with a league-average possession (about 1.1 points); a turnover costs that whole possession. Net is their sum: roughly how many points the offense scored above an average one on the same trips, not who won.

Net Points (vs avg) -14.0

2PT Factor +3.0

3PT Factor -4.0

Turnover Factor -16.1

OREB Factor -1.3

FT Factor +4.4

UTA

Home

PTS

AST

eFG%

46.4%

REB

TOV

Usual 2024-25 (35 g) with 2023-24 · eFG 54.1% · 3P 36.4% · FT 80.3% · 3PA/FGA 0.44 · FTA/FGA 0.26

Shooting

2P% 46.8%

3P% 30.6%

FT Attempts 17

FT% 88.2%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 7

Pts in Paint 42

2nd Chance Pts 11

Steals 9

Blocks 7

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 49

Offensive 11

Defensive 38

Team rebounds 4

OREB% 23.4%

DREB% 74.5%

Four Factors

Net Points (vs avg) -16.9

2PT Factor -2.0

3PT Factor -0.4

Turnover Factor -19.5

OREB Factor -2.3

FT Factor +7.3

MIA VS UTA

Offensive Efficiency

Points

53.7%

2P%

46.8%

47.3%

eFG%

46.4%

28.0%

3P%

30.6%

FTA

73.3%

FT%

88.2%

Pace & Advantage

Assists

Fast Break Pts

Pts in Paint

2nd Chance Pts

Possessions & Rebounds

Total Rebounds

Defensive Rebounds

Offensive Rebounds

Team Rebounds

76.6%

Defensive Reb %

74.5%

25.5%

Offensive Reb %

23.4%

Turnovers

Steals

Blocks

Four Factor Accounting

-14.0

Net Points (vs avg)

-16.9

+3.0

2PT Shooting

-2.0

-4.0

3PT Shooting

-0.4

-16.1

Turnovers

-19.5

-1.3

Off. Rebounding

-2.3

+4.4

Free Throws

+7.3

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

FG% is calculated for each zone from Play-by-Play Data.

Player Sequence Search

Events

Direct Connections All

Waiting for selection...

How they scored

Loading scoring breakdown...

Points off turnovers

Each turnover the other team scored on: off a steal (a live ball), or off a turnover without a steal (out of bounds, a violation, an offensive foul).

Loading event sequences...

Team Analytics

Lineup Analysis

Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions. Best lineup uses Net Rating and requires at least 5 minutes and 10 possessions.

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Uninterrupted lineup intervals with period/clock boundaries and scoring margin.

Interval	Lineup	Min	For	Against	+/-

Player Stat Visualizer

Game Momentum & Flow

Chance to win after each play, from the score, clock, home court and possession. It has no team strength, so early on both teams count as even.

Biggest Lead: UTA (Home)

Biggest Lead: MIA (Away)

Scoring Runs (8-0 or better)

No significant runs detected yet.

Play-by-Play

Loading plays…

Player Game Rotation (Plus/Minus)

Swipe sideways to see the full game

WOWY Combos

Pick up to four players: every on/off combination of them, from this game's five-man lineups. Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions (as on the lineup cards); under 3 minutes is a small sample.