UTA 114–123 GSW · Jan 3, 2026

Final

2026-01-03

Best games of 2025-26 →

UTA

114

123

GSW

NBA Game / League Pass Shot Chart

Standard box score.

Key Performers

Points

Rebounds

Assists

Steals

Blocks

Field goals made

3-pointers made

Free throw attempts

Plus/minus

Turnovers

True shooting %

Against their usual

Points against each player's usual scoring rate for the minutes he has played (this season blended with last season by how much of it there is, season data through Jan 2; the same "usual" as the box score's Vs usual). 8+ minutes and 6+ points off.

UTA

Kevin Love 5 pts · usual 11.2 · -6.2

GSW

Everyone close to usual so far.

Team Comparison

UTA

Away

PTS

114

AST

eFG%

59.9%

REB

TOV

Usual 2025-26 (33 g) with 2024-25 · eFG 53.6% · 3P 35.3% · FT 80.2% · 3PA/FGA 0.44 · FTA/FGA 0.30

Shooting

2P% 62.7%

3P% 37.1%

FT Attempts 17

FT% 64.7%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 19

Pts in Paint 62

2nd Chance Pts 9

Steals 7

Blocks 2

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 37

Offensive 10

Defensive 27

Team rebounds 4

OREB% 23.8%

DREB% 67.5%

Four Factors

Points each part added (+) or cost (−) compared with a league-average possession (about 1.1 points); a turnover costs that whole possession. Net is their sum: roughly how many points the offense scored above an average one on the same trips, not who won.

Net Points (vs avg) +0.6

2PT Factor +11.3

3PT Factor +5.9

Turnover Factor -17.4

OREB Factor -2.7

FT Factor +3.5

GSW

Home

PTS

123

AST

eFG%

60.3%

REB

TOV

Usual 2025-26 (35 g) with 2024-25 · eFG 54.1% · 3P 36.2% · FT 80.8% · 3PA/FGA 0.49 · FTA/FGA 0.26

Shooting

2P% 57.1%

3P% 42.2%

FT Attempts 24

FT% 75.0%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 10

Pts in Paint 46

2nd Chance Pts 18

Steals 9

Blocks 2

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 45

Offensive 13

Defensive 32

Team rebounds 12

OREB% 32.5%

DREB% 76.2%

Four Factors

Net Points (vs avg) +10.4

2PT Factor +5.4

3PT Factor +13.6

Turnover Factor -17.4

OREB Factor +1.5

FT Factor +7.3

UTA VS GSW

Offensive Efficiency

114

Points

123

62.7%

2P%

57.1%

59.9%

eFG%

60.3%

37.1%

3P%

42.2%

FTA

64.7%

FT%

75.0%

Pace & Advantage

Assists

Fast Break Pts

Pts in Paint

2nd Chance Pts

Possessions & Rebounds

Total Rebounds

Defensive Rebounds

Offensive Rebounds

Team Rebounds

67.5%

Defensive Reb %

76.2%

23.8%

Offensive Reb %

32.5%

Turnovers

Steals

Blocks

Four Factor Accounting

+0.6

Net Points (vs avg)

+10.4

+11.3

2PT Shooting

+5.4

+5.9

3PT Shooting

+13.6

-17.4

Turnovers

-17.4

-2.7

Off. Rebounding

+1.5

+3.5

Free Throws

+7.3

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

FG% is calculated for each zone from Play-by-Play Data.

Player Sequence Search

Events

Direct Connections All

Waiting for selection...

How they scored

Loading scoring breakdown...

Points off turnovers

Each turnover the other team scored on: off a steal (a live ball), or off a turnover without a steal (out of bounds, a violation, an offensive foul).

Loading event sequences...

Team Analytics

Lineup Analysis

Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions. Best lineup uses Net Rating and requires at least 5 minutes and 10 possessions.

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Uninterrupted lineup intervals with period/clock boundaries and scoring margin.

Interval	Lineup	Min	For	Against	+/-

Player Stat Visualizer

Game Momentum & Flow

Chance to win after each play, from the score, clock, home court and possession. It has no team strength, so early on both teams count as even.

Biggest Lead: GSW (Home)

Biggest Lead: UTA (Away)

Scoring Runs (8-0 or better)

No significant runs detected yet.

Play-by-Play

Loading plays…

Player Game Rotation (Plus/Minus)

Swipe sideways to see the full game

WOWY Combos

Pick up to four players: every on/off combination of them, from this game's five-man lineups. Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions (as on the lineup cards); under 3 minutes is a small sample.