WAS 136–152 MIA · Apr 4, 2026

Final

2026-04-04

Best games of 2025-26 →

WAS

136

152

MIA

NBA Game / League Pass Shot Chart

Standard box score.

Key Performers

Points

Rebounds

Assists

Steals

Blocks

Field goals made

3-pointers made

Free throw attempts

Plus/minus

Turnovers

True shooting %

Against their usual

Points against each player's usual scoring rate for the minutes he has played (this season blended with last season by how much of it there is, season data through Apr 3; the same "usual" as the box score's Vs usual). 8+ minutes and 6+ points off.

WAS

Will Riley 31 pts · usual 16.9 · +14.1

Sharife Cooper 20 pts · usual 10.9 · +9.1

Jamir Watkins 14 pts · usual 6.2 · +7.8

MIA

Jaime Jaquez Jr. 32 pts · usual 16.4 · +15.6

Andrew Wiggins 21 pts · usual 13.6 · +7.4

Kel'el Ware 24 pts · usual 17.2 · +6.8

Team Comparison

WAS

Away

PTS

136

AST

eFG%

55.2%

REB

TOV

Usual 2025-26 (76 g) with 2024-25 · eFG 53.2% · 3P 35.5% · FT 77.0% · 3PA/FGA 0.41 · FTA/FGA 0.23

Shooting

2P% 50.0%

3P% 42.5%

FT Attempts 24

FT% 79.2%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 24

Pts in Paint 58

2nd Chance Pts 23

Steals 12

Blocks 5

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 44

Offensive 17

Defensive 27

Team rebounds 5

OREB% 30.4%

DREB% 73.0%

Four Factors

Points each part added (+) or cost (−) compared with a league-average possession (about 1.1 points); a turnover costs that whole possession. Net is their sum: roughly how many points the offense scored above an average one on the same trips, not who won.

Net Points (vs avg) +11.5

2PT Factor +0.7

3PT Factor +12.4

Turnover Factor -10.4

OREB Factor +0.7

FT Factor +8.2

MIA

Home

PTS

152

AST

eFG%

67.2%

REB

TOV

Usual 2025-26 (77 g) with 2024-25 · eFG 53.8% · 3P 35.9% · FT 79.2% · 3PA/FGA 0.41 · FTA/FGA 0.27

Shooting

2P% 68.5%

3P% 43.6%

FT Attempts 34

FT% 79.4%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 36

Pts in Paint 74

2nd Chance Pts 23

Steals 6

Blocks 11

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 49

Offensive 10

Defensive 39

Team rebounds 10

OREB% 27.0%

DREB% 69.6%

Four Factors

Net Points (vs avg) +23.7

2PT Factor +17.1

3PT Factor +13.2

Turnover Factor -17.4

OREB Factor -1.0

FT Factor +11.7

WAS VS MIA

Offensive Efficiency

136

Points

152

50.0%

2P%

68.5%

55.2%

eFG%

67.2%

42.5%

3P%

43.6%

FTA

79.2%

FT%

79.4%

Pace & Advantage

Assists

Fast Break Pts

Pts in Paint

2nd Chance Pts

Possessions & Rebounds

Total Rebounds

Defensive Rebounds

Offensive Rebounds

Team Rebounds

73.0%

Defensive Reb %

69.6%

30.4%

Offensive Reb %

27.0%

Turnovers

Steals

Blocks

Four Factor Accounting

+11.5

Net Points (vs avg)

+23.7

+0.7

2PT Shooting

+17.1

+12.4

3PT Shooting

+13.2

-10.4

Turnovers

-17.4

+0.7

Off. Rebounding

-1.0

+8.2

Free Throws

+11.7

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

FG% is calculated for each zone from Play-by-Play Data.

Player Sequence Search

Events

Direct Connections All

Waiting for selection...

How they scored

Loading scoring breakdown...

Points off turnovers

Each turnover the other team scored on: off a steal (a live ball), or off a turnover without a steal (out of bounds, a violation, an offensive foul).

Loading event sequences...

Team Analytics

Lineup Analysis

Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions. Best lineup uses Net Rating and requires at least 5 minutes and 10 possessions.

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Uninterrupted lineup intervals with period/clock boundaries and scoring margin.

Interval	Lineup	Min	For	Against	+/-

Player Stat Visualizer

Game Momentum & Flow

Chance to win after each play, from the score, clock, home court and possession. It has no team strength, so early on both teams count as even.

Biggest Lead: MIA (Home)

Biggest Lead: WAS (Away)

Scoring Runs (8-0 or better)

No significant runs detected yet.

Play-by-Play

Loading plays…

Player Game Rotation (Plus/Minus)

Swipe sideways to see the full game

WOWY Combos

Pick up to four players: every on/off combination of them, from this game's five-man lineups. Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions (as on the lineup cards); under 3 minutes is a small sample.