CHI 129–98 WAS · Apr 7, 2026

Final

2026-04-07

Best games of 2025-26 →

CHI

129

WAS

NBA Game / League Pass Shot Chart

Standard box score.

Key Performers

Points

Rebounds

Assists

Steals

Blocks

Field goals made

3-pointers made

Free throw attempts

Plus/minus

Turnovers

True shooting %

Against their usual

Points against each player's usual scoring rate for the minutes he has played (this season blended with last season by how much of it there is, season data through Apr 6; the same "usual" as the box score's Vs usual). 8+ minutes and 6+ points off.

CHI

Rob Dillingham 26 pts · usual 11.0 · +15.0

Patrick Williams 20 pts · usual 10.9 · +9.1

Tre Jones 20 pts · usual 12.8 · +7.2

WAS

Bilal Coulibaly 19 pts · usual 10.0 · +9.0

Will Riley 2 pts · usual 14.7 · -12.7

Justin Champagnie 5 pts · usual 12.6 · -7.6

Team Comparison

CHI

Away

PTS

129

AST

eFG%

56.9%

REB

TOV

Usual 2025-26 (78 g) with 2024-25 · eFG 54.9% · 3P 36.0% · FT 77.9% · 3PA/FGA 0.45 · FTA/FGA 0.24

Shooting

2P% 63.3%

3P% 33.3%

FT Attempts 27

FT% 81.5%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 31

Pts in Paint 56

2nd Chance Pts 15

Steals 14

Blocks 7

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 52

Offensive 9

Defensive 43

Team rebounds 5

OREB% 19.1%

DREB% 84.3%

Four Factors

Points each part added (+) or cost (−) compared with a league-average possession (about 1.1 points); a turnover costs that whole possession. Net is their sum: roughly how many points the offense scored above an average one on the same trips, not who won.

Net Points (vs avg) +3.5

2PT Factor +11.3

3PT Factor +3.0

Turnover Factor -15.1

OREB Factor -5.5

FT Factor +9.8

WAS

Home

PTS

AST

eFG%

49.4%

REB

TOV

Usual 2025-26 (78 g) with 2024-25 · eFG 53.3% · 3P 35.6% · FT 76.8% · 3PA/FGA 0.41 · FTA/FGA 0.23

Shooting

2P% 54.2%

3P% 28.9%

FT Attempts 21

FT% 61.9%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 14

Pts in Paint 44

2nd Chance Pts 7

Steals 8

Blocks 7

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 46

Offensive 8

Defensive 38

Team rebounds 10

OREB% 15.7%

DREB% 80.9%

Four Factors

Net Points (vs avg) -27.9

2PT Factor +3.8

3PT Factor -1.9

Turnover Factor -25.5

OREB Factor -8.1

FT Factor +3.8

CHI VS WAS

Offensive Efficiency

129

Points

63.3%

2P%

54.2%

56.9%

eFG%

49.4%

33.3%

3P%

28.9%

FTA

81.5%

FT%

61.9%

Pace & Advantage

Assists

Fast Break Pts

Pts in Paint

2nd Chance Pts

Possessions & Rebounds

Total Rebounds

Defensive Rebounds

Offensive Rebounds

Team Rebounds

84.3%

Defensive Reb %

80.9%

19.1%

Offensive Reb %

15.7%

Turnovers

Steals

Blocks

Four Factor Accounting

+3.5

Net Points (vs avg)

-27.9

+11.3

2PT Shooting

+3.8

+3.0

3PT Shooting

-1.9

-15.1

Turnovers

-25.5

-5.5

Off. Rebounding

-8.1

+9.8

Free Throws

+3.8

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

FG% is calculated for each zone from Play-by-Play Data.

Player Sequence Search

Events

Direct Connections All

Waiting for selection...

How they scored

Loading scoring breakdown...

Points off turnovers

Each turnover the other team scored on: off a steal (a live ball), or off a turnover without a steal (out of bounds, a violation, an offensive foul).

Loading event sequences...

Team Analytics

Lineup Analysis

Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions. Best lineup uses Net Rating and requires at least 5 minutes and 10 possessions.

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Uninterrupted lineup intervals with period/clock boundaries and scoring margin.

Interval	Lineup	Min	For	Against	+/-

Player Stat Visualizer

Game Momentum & Flow

Chance to win after each play, from the score, clock, home court and possession. It has no team strength, so early on both teams count as even.

Biggest Lead: WAS (Home)

Biggest Lead: CHI (Away)

Scoring Runs (8-0 or better)

No significant runs detected yet.

Play-by-Play

Loading plays…

Player Game Rotation (Plus/Minus)

Swipe sideways to see the full game

WOWY Combos

Pick up to four players: every on/off combination of them, from this game's five-man lineups. Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions (as on the lineup cards); under 3 minutes is a small sample.