CourtSketch

Final

2026-10-22

UTA

103

123

MEM

Play-by-Play Shot Chart

Key Performers

PTS

Keyonte George

Ty Jerome

REB

Lauri Markkanen

Cameron Boozer

AST

Keyonte George

Ty Jerome

STL

Svi Mykhailiuk

Jaylen Wells

BLK

Jaxson Hayes

Zach Edey

FGM

Keyonte George

Ty Jerome

FG3M

Keyonte George

Ty Jerome

FTA

Lauri Markkanen

Ty Jerome

PLUS MINUS

Kyle Filipowski

0.0

Cameron Boozer

32.0

TOV

Jaren Jackson Jr.

GG Jackson

TS PCT

Svi Mykhailiuk

100.0 %

Quinten Post

87.5 %

Team Comparison

UTA

Away

PTS

103

AST

eFG%

53.3%

REB

TOV

Shooting

2P% 55.8%

3P% 33.3%

FT Attempts 33

FT% 66.7%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 9

Pts in Paint 46

2nd Chance Pts 6

Steals 9

Blocks 12

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 44

Offensive 5

Defensive 33

OREB% 11.1%

DREB% 68.8%

Four Factors

Net Points -9

2PT Factor 7

3PT Factor 4

Turnover Factor -20

OREB Factor -8

FT Factor 8

MEM

Home

PTS

123

AST

eFG%

54.3%

REB

TOV

Shooting

2P% 52.5%

3P% 38.2%

FT Attempts 28

FT% 78.6%

Advantage & Defense

Fast Break Pts 23

Pts in Paint 58

2nd Chance Pts 17

Steals 8

Blocks 7

Calculating stops data…

Shot Zones (PBP)

Calculating spatial data…

Rebounding

Total 63

Offensive 15

Defensive 40

OREB% 31.2%

DREB% 88.9%

Four Factors

Net Points 10

2PT Factor 6

3PT Factor 8

Turnover Factor -16

OREB Factor 2

FT Factor 10

UTA VS MEM

Offensive Efficiency

103.0

Points

123.0

55.8 %

2P%

52.5 %

53.3 %

eFG%

54.3 %

33.3 %

3P%

38.2 %

33.0

FTA

28.0

66.7 %

FT%

78.6 %

Pace & Advantage

25.0

Assists

23.0

9.0

Fast Break Pts

23.0

46.0

Pts in Paint

58.0

6.0

2nd Chance Pts

17.0

Possessions & Rebounds

44.0

Total Rebounds

63.0

33.0

Defensive Rebounds

40.0

5.0

Offensive Rebounds

15.0

68.8 %

Defensive Reb %

88.9 %

11.1 %

Offensive Reb %

31.2 %

18.0

Turnovers

15.0

9.0

Steals

8.0

12.0

Blocks

7.0

Four Factor Accounting

-9.2

Net Points

9.8

6.8

2PT Shooting

6.0

3.6

3PT Shooting

8.2

-19.7

Turnovers

-16.4

-8.2

Off. Rebounding

1.8

8.3

Free Throws

10.2

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

FG% is calculated for each zone from Play-by-Play Data.

PBP Analytics

Scoring Breakdown (Assisted/Unassisted)

Loading scoring breakdown...

Turnover Event Sequences (StS/PnT)

Loading event sequences...

Team Analytics

Player Stat Visualizer

Full Box Score

Standard box score.

Lineup Analysis

Ratings are points per 100 estimated possessions. Best lineup uses Net Rating and requires at least 5 minutes and 10 possessions.

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Uninterrupted lineup intervals with period/clock boundaries and scoring margin.

Interval	Lineup	Min	For	Against	+/-

Game Archive

Live Action

1st Qtr

Completed

Limit Reached

You can only select up to 5 players.

CourtSketch Analytics

Player Name

Points

—

Minutes —

+/− —

Shooting

TS — eFG —

Field Goals —/—

3-Point —/—

Free Throws —/—

—

REB

O—/D—

—

AST

—

STL

—

BLK

—

TOV

—

Calculating network impact...

Net Rating Differential

Team net rating, player on vs. off

—

	On	Off	Δ
MIN	—	—
POSS	—	—
PTS	—	—
ORtg	—	—	—
DRtg	—	—	—
NET	—	—	—

Menu

Key Performers

PTS

REB

AST

STL

BLK

FGM

FG3M

FTA

PLUS MINUS

TOV

TS PCT

Team Comparison

UTA

MEM

Offensive Efficiency

Pace & Advantage

Possessions & Rebounds

Four Factor Accounting

Shot Zone Efficiency (PBP)

PBP Analytics

Scoring Breakdown (Assisted/Unassisted)

Turnover Event Sequences (StS/PnT)

Team Analytics

Player Stat Visualizer

Full Box Score

Player Sequence Search

Events

Direct Connections All

Team Analytics

Lineup Analysis

Five-Man Lineup Stints

Player Stat Visualizer

Game Momentum & Flow

Biggest Lead: MEM (Home)

Biggest Lead: UTA (Away)

Scoring Runs (8-0 or better)

Player Game Rotation (Plus/Minus)

Lineup Impact Tool

UTA

MEM

Time Range (Optional)

Filtered Player Box Score

Live Action

Completed

Limit Reached

Player Name

Shooting